Dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (nc3DCRT) planning and radio biologically optimized partial arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning of unilateral brain tumours – a retrospective study

Ashish Binjola, S. Megha Singh, Seema Sharma, V. Subramani, Subhash Gupta, Subhash Chander, Prateek Kumar, G. K. Rath

Abstract


Aim: To compare non-coplanar 3DCRT planning and partial arc VMAT planning dosimetrically for unilateral brain tumours.

Introduction:Intensity modulated radiation therapyhas gainedwide popularity as a radiotherapy treatment of choice for many clinical sites. Volumetric modulated arc therapy is a kind of therapy in which rather than using multiple static fields at different gantry angles, one or multiple full or partial arcs are used for radiotherapy planning and treatment. Its ability to provide superior target coverage and better normal tissue sparing makes it a treatment of choice over conventional and 3DCRT radiotherapy planning techniques. But, on the same time volume of low dose region which can increase probability of secondary malignancy in VMAT planning is reported to be on the higher side. Our study compares various parameters of plan quality along with low dose volumes in the techniques under comparison.

Materials and methods:10 anonymized patients with unilateral malignant brain tumours previously treated with nc3DCRT were selected for the study and planned with partial arc VMAT. Conformity Index, Homogeneity Index, Target Coverage, Doses to critical structures and normal brain were compared.

Conclusion:In our study by using VMAT technique we were able to reduce doses to critical structures (Brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm) significantly, got better target coverage along with lesser number of MUs per fraction and significant reduction in low dose volume and reduction in doses to contralateral normal structures including lesser amount of low dose volume.


Keywords


Partial arc volumetric modulated arc therapy, low dose volume, dose conformity,radiobiological optimization, Monte Carlo calculations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. The British Journal of Radiology. 2011; 84(1007):967-996. doi:10.1259/bjr/22373346.

Hardcastle N, Tomé WA, Foo K, Miller A, Carolan M, Metcalfe P. Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans. Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. 2011;36(3):292-298. doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2010.06.001.

Miura H, Fujiwara M, Tanooka M, et al. Dosimetric and delivery characterizations of full-arc and half-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy for maxillary cancer. Journal of Radiation Research. 2012; 53(5):785-790. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrs031.

Foroudi F, Wilson L, Bressel M, et al. A dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal vs intensity modulated vs volumetric arc radiation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Radiation Oncology (London, England). 2012;7:111. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-7-111.

Haciislamoglu E, Colak F, Canyilmaz E, et al. The choice of multi-beam IMRT for whole breast radiotherapy in early-stage right breast cancer. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):688. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2314-2.

Navarria P, Pessina F, Cozzi L, et al. Can advanced new radiation therapy technologies improve outcome of high grade glioma (HGG) patients? analysis of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients treated with surgery, concomitant and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:362. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2399-6.

Newhauser WD, Durante M. Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy. Nature reviews Cancer. 2011;11(6):438-448. doi:10.1038/nrc3069.

Schneider U, Sumila M, Robotka J, Weber D, Gruber G. Radiation-induced second malignancies after involved-node radiotherapy with deep-inspiration breath-hold technique for early stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: a dosimetric study. Radiation Oncology (London, England). 2014;9:58. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-9-58.

Nahum AE, Uzan J. (Radio)Biological Optimization of External-Beam Radiotherapy. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2012;2012:329214. doi:10.1155/2012/329214.

Niemierko A. Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys. 1997;24:103–10

Ohtakara K, Hayashi S, Hoshi H. The relation between various conformity indices and the influence of the target coverage difference in prescription isodose surface on these values in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. The British Journal of Radiology. 2012;85(1014):e223-e228. doi:10.1259/bjr/36606138.

Kataria T, Sharma K, Subramani V, Karrthick KP, Bisht SS. Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments. Journal of Medical Physics / Association of Medical Physicists of India. 2012;37(4):207-213. doi:10.4103/0971-6203.103606.

Jiang X, Li T, Liu Y, et al. Planning analysis for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric and efficiency comparisons between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), single-arc/partial-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (SA/PA-VMAT). Radiation Oncology (London, England). 2011;6:140. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-140.

Malignant Glioma: Is VMAT Truly better than 3DCRT?Ward, LucyJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , S27




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7439/ijasr.v3i3.4067

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.