Knowledge and Utilization of Cervical Screening among Female Health Workers in Jos University Teaching Hospital and the role of the Gynaecologist in screening

Tinuade Abimbola Oyebode, Sagay Atiene, Ekwempu Chinedu, Shambe Iornum, Afolaranmi Tolu, Kahansim Markswal, Anyaka Charles, Egbodo Christopher, Daru Patrick


Background: Cervical carcinoma is a preventable women killer disease and the knowledge and utilization of cervical screening is very important in its prevention.

Aims: The aim is to determine the knowledge, attitude and practice of JUTH female health workers to cervical screening, as well as the role of the gynaecologist in referral for screening tests.

Study design and Methods: A cross-sectional study of the female health workers in JUTH was carried out using a stratified sampling technique and the same proportion of the various cadres were sampled using a structured questionnaire, and the results were analysed.

Results: A total of 200 women were recruited, and 93.5% said they knew about Pap smear but only 56.5% knew what it was actually meant for and 19% of the study had done Pap smear in the past. There was no reason given in 59% of the subjects for not carrying out a Pap smear, while 19.5% gave non physician referral as reason. Among the 38 women who had had a Pap smear, 36.8% had done it more than 2 years previously. A total of 104 women visited gynaecologists at various times, but only 15.4% were asked to have a Pap smear.

Conclusion: The knowledge and utilization of Pap smear is poor and the gynaecologists have many missed opportunities for Opportunistic Pap smear.

Keywords: Female health worker, gynaecologist, Pap smear, cervical screening.



Female health worker, gynaecologist, Pap smear, cervical screening

Full Text:



Nuns D, Symonds RP. Improving the prognosis of cervical cancer. In: Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Volume 15, Churchill Living Stone. 2003; 317 – 332.

Shafi. MI. Premalignant and malignant diseases of the cervix. In: Edmond K (Ed), Dewhursts Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates, Sixth Edition, Blackwell science, 1999; 572 – 581.

Azzan BB. Tumors of the Cervix Uteri. In: Agboola A (Ed), Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for medical Students University services educational Publishers Limited, Lagos, and 2000; 220 – 235.

Chuwkwauh LI, Onuigbo WIB, Mgbor NC. Cervic al Screening in Enugu Nigeria. Trop J. obstet. Gynaecol, 20(2) October 2003; 109 – 112.

Pindiga UH, El-Nafty AU, Ekanem IA. Female genital malignancies in Maiduguri, Nigeria: a review of 328 cases. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, 16, 1999; 52 – 56.

Onah HE, Ezugwu FO, Eze JN. Cervical Cancer Screening: A Survey of current practice Amongst Nigerian gynecologist. Trop J obstet Gynaecol, 18 (2), October, 2001; 78 – 81.

Olaniyan OB, Agboghoroma OC, Ladipo OP. Knowledge and Practice of Cervical screening Among Female health workers in Government Hospitals in Abuja metropolis, Nigeria. Trop J. Obstet Gynaecol, 17(1), 2000; 18-20.

Cervical Cancer: The facts, by Primary Care Division, Common Wealth Department of Health and Ageing, http://www.Cervical

Briggs ND. Common Gynaecological Tumors, Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, Special Edition 1995; 62 – 67.

World Health Organizatin, Viral causes of Cervical Cancer. New detection Technologies available. World med J 43, 1997, 43:29 – 30.

Anorlu RI, Banjo AAF, Odoemelum C, Eghagle ME, Abudu OO. Cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening: Level of awareness in women attending a Primary Health Care Facility in Lagos, Nigeria. The Nigerian Postgraduate medical Journal, Vol. 7, No1, March 2000; 1-4.

American Cancer Society: Cancer facts and figures, Atlanta, American Cancer Society, 1995; 6.

Campbell S, Monga A. Malignant diseases of the uterus and cervix. In: Gynaecolgy by Ten Teachers, ELST, 2000; 143 – 154.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology. Cervical Neoplasia. In: Precis; An update in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1998; 26 – 30.

Babatunde S, Ikimalo J, Obiebi L, Prince Will F and Uzah D. Routine Cervical Screening in an Antenatal Clinic setting in Port – Harcourt: A survey of knowledge, Attitude and Practice Among Attendees. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, 20 (Suppl 1), November 2003; 527.

Herbst AL. Intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. In: comprehensive Gynaecology, Mosby yearbook, 1998; 821 – 860.

Omigbodun AO. Reprodcutive Health at the Turn the Millenium: A Glance Back. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, 18 (1), April 2001; 2-7.

Spitzer M. Cervical Screening adjuncts: recent advances. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 172, 1998; 544 – 556.

Godfrey SE. The Pap smear, Automated Rescreening and Negligent Non-disclosure. Am J. Clin Pathol, 111, 1999; 14 – 17.

Thomas J, Ojemakinde O, Izebvaye I. Current concepts in Cervcial Carcinogenesis and New Perspecives in prevention. Reprodcutive Health Archives of Ibadan medicine. 2002; 36 – 39.

Sagay AS, Egbodo C, Kabiru MI, Imade GE. Knowledge, Attitude and practice of cervical screening (Pap Smear) amongst Nurses in Jos. Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Nigeria, 31st Annual general meeting and Scientific Conference Publication, 1999; 49 – 50.

Ayinde OA, Omighbodun AO, Ilesannni AO Cervical Cancer Risks, knowledge of Papanicolaou’s Smear and its utilization Among female undergraduates. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, Vol 120: Suppl 1, Nov 2003; 528.

Ayinde OA, Omigbodun AO. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Related to Prevention of Cancer of the cervix among female Health workers in Ibadan. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, 20 (Suppl 1) Nov 2003; 529.

Omigbodun AO; Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia where culposcopy is not available, Cent. Afr J Med 37:1991; 7 – 11.

Screening for Cervical Cancer, Topic Page. March 2012. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at

Viewed on 30/05/2015

Cervical Cancer Screening. Risks of Cervical Cancer Screening.NIH. National Cancer Institute. Available at

Viewed on 30/05/2015


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Biomedical Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)