Background and Objectives: Pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) is an objective, sensitive and non-invasive neurophysiological test that can prove to be a useful clinical tool in investigating the physiology and pathophysiology of human visual system. A successful clinical application of the test, however, is not possible without the acquisition of a normative data adjusted to known confounding physiological variables. Hence, this study attempted to obtain PRVEP values in different age-groups and gender in healthy adults and also to find out the influence of head size and body mass index on PRVEP parameters. Methods: PRVEP was recorded in 52 healthy adults in the age-group of 18-70 years. PRVEP parameters were compared in different age-groups and gender using one way ANOVA. Head size and BMI were correlated with PRVEP parameters by Pearson correlation coefficient and the significance of difference analysed. Results: The study demonstrated statistically significant differences in mean P100 latency among various age-groups. Gender difference revealed statistical significant difference in both the PREVP parameters (P100 latency and N75-P100 amplitude). The correlation of head size and BMI with PRVEP parameters could not be found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Clinical interpretation of PRVEP should be based on age and sex matched normal subjects besides standardizing the technical parameters of the laboratory. This study also suggests that endocrinal differences should be borne in mind besides the anatomical differences for gender variation in PRVEP-P100 latency.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).